Controversial historical statues and monuments currently drawing the ire of protesters should be relocated to a nine-county area in northwestern Oklahoma, the region’s state senator said Thursday.

State Sen. Casey Murdock, R-Felt, said while protesters have torn down statues depicting Civil War Confederate officers and soldiers nationwide, they’ve also targeted statues of Union officers and called for the removal of religious artwork that depicts Jesus with light skin and hair.

“Four years ago, President George W. Bush spoke at the opening of the National Museum of African (American) History and Culture in Washington D.C., and he said a great nation does not hide its history, it faces its flaws and corrects them,” Murdock said. “We must face our flaws and move forward as a nation, but erasing our history dooms us to repeat it.”

Murdock said he believes artistic representations should be protected so that the country can continue to learn from them.

“It makes no sense,” Murdock said the statues that have been targeted for destruction. “It’s even gotten to the point where some extremists have called for the removal or destruction of art depicting Jesus with light skin and hair. Jesus taught us to love our neighbors as ourselves — focusing on skin color diminished his message and teachings. This is just wrong.”

Murdock said private donations would pay for the relocation of statues to the nine counties in his state Senate district.

“We must preserve our history — the good, the bad, and yes, even the ugly,” he said. “These statues and monuments are interpretations of the personalities and events that shaped our nation, and as the decades have passed, our perspectives and context for these events and people have changed. All of that must be part of the discussion, but censoring that discussion circumvents growth and denies reality.”

House Minority Leader Emily Virgin, D-Norman, said if Murdock wants to preserve and learn about history, he should read a book. Statues and memorials that “glorify people who sought to marginalize people in America” aren’t necessary.

“For an elected representative to be focusing on that aspect of everything that has been happening is pretty disappointing,” Virgin said. “To be concerned about the statues in Oklahoma seems to be missing the point.”

She said she also worries about the image the state would be sending to prospective businesses and residents by displaying controversial monuments.

“I would be really worried about the message that Oklahoma itself would be sending if people in these other places have decided that these statues and monuments were not appropriate in their localities that we would welcome them in Oklahoma.”

State Sen. George Young, D-Oklahoma City, who is the former chair of the state’s Legislative Black Caucus, said Murdock’s plan is “tone deaf.”

He said it would be hurtful to drive around northwest Oklahoma and randomly encounter objectionable statues spread across the region. He said he doesn’t understand why Murdock suddenly wants to cut out a section of Oklahoma to house them.

“He was trying to find a safe way to do what a lot of individuals are trying to fight against, which is preserving history that is offensive to us,” Young said. “I think a lot of those monuments need to come down because they are offensive. It was a negative indication of where our country was trying to go. They promote a past that most of us are not very proud of.”

Young said he doesn’t know of any Union soldier statues that have been toppled. He said the monuments targeted by protesters feature people who were traitors or individuals who thought some people’s lives were worth less than others.

Young said if Murdock wants to construct a building to privately hide the controversial statues, that would be fine, but they shouldn’t be publicly displayed.

“If I don’t want to come, I don’t have to come see them,” he said.

Stecklein covers the Oklahoma Statehouse for CNHI's newspapers and websites. Reach her at

This Week's Circulars

Recommended for you