So, now we know the three obviously lost teenagers involved in the Duncan shooting of an innocent Australian baseball player were not officially involved in a gang.
Of course, this doesn't stop the clearly troubled youths from being inspired by them or the "thug life" and whatever that means.
Their "pasts" are out there for everyone to see, from a spread in the Oklahoman that includes a Facebook photo of two of the boys flashing "gang signs," to a New York Daily News online article that includes a looping video of one of the group pointing a rifle kitted with a scope at the camera.
Sure, that stuff matters; but, how much?
What does it mean to the family and friends of Chris Lane that these three young men appear to have lived a life relatively separate from the understood rules and duties of society? For Lane's loved ones, it doesn't matter. These kids could have been black, white, hispanic, fellow Australians. The point is, it happened, and while we're busy psycho-analyzing the suspects - since, legally, they haven't been convicted yet - the key piece in this whole saga remains to be looked at: the gun.
It remains unseen both in our minds and physically, since police have yet to even locate the weapon allegedly used.
Pictures of guns have been found with the suspects all over social media, so is no one wondering where they got the guns? How did they get them? And why are there so many guns just laying around that they can be picked up by anyone, even children?
Just yesterday, a five-year-old in Memphis was taken into police custody after he fired a gun in his elementary school cafeteria. Barely into childhood, and somehow he not only got ahold of a handgun, but also fired it. Luckily, no one was injured.