subscribesubscriber servicescontact usabout ussite mapBuy a Classified
Tue, Feb 09 2010 
Breaking News:  WINTER WEATHER UPDATE  February 08, 2010 04:19 pm

Published: June 17, 2006 10:15 am    print this story  

It’s time to pass a helmet law

Jerry Pittman
The Express-Star

CHICKASHA One of the biggest stories of last week was Super Bowl hero Ben Roethlisberger's motorcycle accident.

The Steelers quarterback collided with a car and was hurled head first into the windshield, breaking his jaw, his nose, several teeth and other facial bones.

He was not wearing a helmet. In hindsight, he regrets that decision. Had he been wearing a helmet, the severity of his injuries most likely would have been reduced.

Each year, almost 2,500 people are killed and more than 50,000 injured in motorcycle crashes, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation's National Highway Traffic Administration.

Many of those killed and maimed were not wearing helmets.

The argument that most helmetless riders make is that helmet laws are government interference. They say they have the right to take risks and to gamble against death and permanent injury. They argue that the helmets don't prevent crashes and sometimes exasperates the injuries.

Here are the facts, according to the NHTA:

• Motorcycle helmets save lives.

• Motorcycle helmets reduce the severity of injuries.

• State helmet use laws result in many more people using helmets, and when more people use helmets, the costs to family and society resulting from motorcycle deaths and injuries go down.

Let's take a closer look at a couple of those points.

Louisiana mandated in 1982 that all riders wear helmets. In that first year after the law was enacted, motorcycle fatalities were reduced by almost one-third. Fairly convincing evidence - helmets do save lives.

Opponents say imposing helmets on riders does not impact the rest of the population. But numerous studies comparing hospital costs of helmeted and unhelmeted motorcyclists involved in crashes have found costs for unhelmeted riders to average $3,000 more than for helmeted riders. And, riders who don't wear helmets are less likely to have health insurance, resulting in the cost of their care being forced on to taxpayers. It does impact me if you don't wear your helmet.

Oklahoma is among the states which don't require helmets for adults.

It's time for that to change. A helmet law makes sense.

Jerry Pittman is publisher of The Express-Star. You can e-mail him at jpittman@cnhi.com

print this story  



autoconx
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Premium Jobs

HELP WANTED
Your Next Hire Could Be Reading This...>MORE

See all ads

Premium Autos

Your ad could be here!
Ask Sherrie how you can get 28,000 people to see your ad! Call 224-2600....>MORE

See all ads

Premium Homes

HOUSES FOR SALE
Your House Could Be Here...>MORE

See all ads

Premium Text

Make our Premium Ads work for you
Are you reading this? So are your customers.?Contact an Express-Star Advertising Representative to find out how you can ...>MORE

See all ads

Premium Jobs

See all ads

Premium Autos

See all ads

Premium Homes

See all ads

Premium Extras

See all ads


 

Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc.CNHI Classified Advertising NetworkCNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2009. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope and our Internet Yellow Pages site is powered by PremierGuide.
Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
View our Privacy Policy
Advertiser index